Evidence-gated go-to-market roadmap

One workflow.
Multiple runtimes.
Expansion earned by evidence.

Abstract

Ouroboros turns ambiguous intent into an approved specification, an evaluated result, and reusable operating assets. This roadmap describes how that workflow moves from an open-source engine and public product surfaces to runtime partnerships and, only after field evidence, enterprise delivery.

Verified evidencePlanned validationProposed / conditionalNo calendar promises

Decision brief

A proposal for a controlled Kiro validation, not an open-ended sponsorship.

Decision requested

Nominate a Kiro technical counterpart and agree to scope one user situation, one representative task, and one twice-run pilot.

Bounded support

Integration review, controlled usage credits, access to an agreed user cohort, and joint evidence review.

Go / no-go gate

Proceed only if the user approves the Seed, the result passes predeclared criteria, the second run reuses prior assets without rebuilding context or procedure, completed requirements remain intact, repeat-use intent appears, and intervention and operating cost can be recorded.

Owners and review

Sergio is the proposed Ouroboros owner for implementation and measurement. AWS/Kiro would nominate one counterpart for platform review and pilot access. Public claims require mutual written approval.

The commercial thesis

The product is the specification-and-evaluation workflow. Platforms are distribution and execution surfaces, not the identity of the product.

Clarity before execution

The system does not build until the user's intent is explicit enough to become a specification.

Criteria before approval

A result is judged against declared acceptance criteria, not against whether it merely looks convincing.

III

Assets after every loop

Each cycle leaves a Seed, workflow, evaluation record, and lineage that can reduce repeated explanation and setup.

The invariant workflow

The loop remains stable while the execution environment changes.

InterviewExpose intent and ambiguity

SeedFreeze the approved specification

ExecutePerform the declared work

EvaluateTest against measurable criteria

EvolveFeed evidence into the next Seed

↺ evaluation evidence returns to the next Seed

Seedcanonical intent

Workflowrepeatable route

Evaluationdecision evidence

Lineagechange history

Roadmap by evidence, not dates

Each horizon opens only when the preceding evidence exists. Sequence is intentional; timing is not promised.

VerifiedPlanned validationProposed / conditional

FoundationVerified

Open engine and multi-runtime execution

The workflow exists as an open-source engine with runtime integrations, including Kiro among the supported environments.

Specification-first core
Evaluation and lineage primitives
Runtime-independent product thesis
Public source and release history

Public proofPlanned validation

Agree the first pilot contract, then validate public reach

The canonical current gate is to define one user situation, one representative task, a baseline, and observable success and failure criteria. ChatGPT Hosted entry is planned; official directory submission and external activation remain unverified.

First user situation and representative task
One complete user workflow
Second-run reuse evidence
Operating cost and human intervention record

Runtime partnershipsConditional

Co-validate the same workflow inside partner environments

The proposal for AWS and Kiro is a bounded joint validation: prove that specification quality and evaluation discipline improve completion inside Kiro without making Ouroboros dependent on one platform.

Reference integration
Joint user pilot
Usage credit for controlled testing
Evidence-led case study

Enterprise deliveryConditional

Add control only when real customers require it

Self-hosting, compliance controls, and service commitments remain candidates until field demand and willingness to pay are observed.

Data-boundary requirements
Audit and approval controls
Service-level requirements
Repeatable deployment economics

Workflow economyConditional

Distribute workflows only after portability is proven

A marketplace is considered only after workflows are accumulated, reused, and shown to transfer beyond a single user's context.

Portable domain workflows
Third-party contribution controls
Measured reuse
Sustainable distribution model

What is true now

Claim status is part of the product. Verified facts, active work, and conditional plans are never blended.

Claim	Status	Evidence / gate
Ouroboros workflow engine	Verified	Public source, releases, interview, Seed, execution, evaluation, and evolution primitives.
Multi-runtime support, including Kiro	Verified	Recorded in the GTM canonical technical inventory; partnership is not implied.
ChatGPT Hosted entry	Planned	The canonical GTM gate is 0/3: submission contract, official directory submission, and first external activation remain unverified.
AWS / Kiro joint program	Proposal	Requires partner agreement, a bounded pilot, named resources, and shared success criteria.
Enterprise and marketplace offerings	Conditional	Require observed demand, workflow reuse, control requirements, and viable operating economics.

A bounded proposal for AWS and Kiro

The ask is not generic sponsorship. It is a proposed controlled validation intended to produce implementation evidence, user evidence, and a publishable decision.

Joint work

Define one Kiro user situation and one representative task.
Connect the Ouroboros Interview–Seed–Evaluate loop without platform lock-in.
Run the task twice to test reuse, not only first-run completion.
Publish findings only after both parties approve the evidence.

Requested support

A technical counterpart for Kiro integration review
Controlled usage credits for the pilot
Access to an agreed pilot user cohort
A joint review of the resulting case study

Ouroboros contributes

The open workflow engine, the integration boundary, pilot instrumentation, evaluation design, and maintainership.

The partnership should produce

A reproducible integration, measured user evidence, an explicit go/no-go decision, and a jointly approved public narrative.

Success is observed, then priced

No unsupported targets are published. The pilot first defines how each signal is measured; target values follow observed baselines.

CompletionDid the task satisfy every declared specification item and pass verification?

PreservationDid the second run preserve what was already complete?

ReuseDid the next run use the previous Seed and workflow without rebuilding context and procedure?

Delegated timeHow much agreed manual work did the workflow replace?

Human interventionWas intervention an expected approval point or repeated reconstruction?

Operating costCan runtime, support, and maintenance cost be attributed per workflow?

Publication and negotiation policy

Conservative language protects both the product and the counterparty.

We will

Label every claim as verified, active, proposed, or conditional.
Link expansion to a measurable gate.
Keep Ouroboros independent of any one model, runtime, or cloud.
Seek mutual review before publishing partner claims.

Not Todo

No invented launch dates, market sizes, savings, or adoption numbers.
No implication of OpenAI, AWS, or Kiro approval, sponsorship, or endorsement.
No enterprise security, compliance, SLA, or self-hosting promise before requirements are contracted.
No marketplace timeline before workflow portability is demonstrated.
No token economics, cryptocurrency narrative, or speculative fundraising language.

Sources and status note

Product philosophy, workflow, success measures, and roadmap gates follow the canonical Ouro-labs GTM repository.
Open-source implementation evidence is maintained in Q00/ouroboros.
Platform and partner names identify compatibility or a proposed validation surface. They do not imply endorsement or a commercial relationship.
This public roadmap is a decision framework, not a commitment to ship on a fixed date.

One workflow.Multiple runtimes.Expansion earned by evidence.